Question 39d Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: Personal property in my jurisdiction is audited frequently enough to ensure accuracy. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39e Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT is a barrier to economic development in my jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39f Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace my jurisdiction's PPT revenues in full, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39g Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most of my jurisdiction's PPT revenues, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39h Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most or all PPT revenues (but it is not guaranteed in the Constitution), I trust the state will follow through in the future on its commitment to provide those funds. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39e Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT is a barrier to economic development in my jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39f Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace my jurisdiction's PPT revenues in full, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39g Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most of my jurisdiction's PPT revenues, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39h Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most or all PPT revenues (but it is not guaranteed in the Constitution), I trust the state will follow through in the future on its commitment to provide those funds. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39f Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace my jurisdiction's PPT revenues in full, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39g Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most of my jurisdiction's PPT revenues, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39h Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most or all PPT revenues (but it is not guaranteed in the Constitution), I trust the state will follow through in the future on its commitment to provide those funds. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39g Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most of my jurisdiction's PPT revenues, I would support elimination of the PPT. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39h Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most or all PPT revenues (but it is not guaranteed in the Constitution), I trust the state will follow through in the future on its commitment to provide those funds. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39h Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: If the state agrees to replace most or all PPT revenues (but it is not guaranteed in the Constitution), I trust the state will follow through in the future on its commitment to provide those funds. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39i Personal Property Tax (PPT) reform is a policy priority in Lansing, and we want to get your perspectives about the PPT overall. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following general statements about the PPT: The PPT currently is an important source of revenue for my jurisdiction's budget. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 40a To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Industrial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 40b To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Commercial personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 40c To what extent would you say the following types of Personal Property Tax (PPT) are important sources of revenue for your jurisdiction's budget: Utility personal property tax Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 41 If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, Finance Budget and Operations, State oversight, Taxes, Finances, Personal property tax, Revenue, Taxes and revenues Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 42 Last year, the state enacted the "Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act" (P.A. 4 of 2011), a law that governs when and how emergency managers are appointed to oversee local governments and school districts in fiscal distress. How familiar are you with this law? Survey Spring 2012 Categories Emergency Manager Law, State oversight, State policies, State government Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 43 Overall, how effective or ineffective do you believe the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011) has been or will be, at restoring or protecting the fiscal health of local governments across the state? Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44a Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an Emergency Manager (EM) to reject, modify, or terminate collective bargaining agreements. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44b Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to set aside decision-making powers of local elected officials. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44c Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) the sale, transfer, or lease of the local jurisdiction's assets. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44d Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing an EM to recommend (with approval of the state) collaboration or consolidation with other jurisdictions, or disincorporation of the local jurisdiction. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44e Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: Allowing a current local official, such as a mayor or council member, to be appointed as an EM. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 44f Now we would like your opinion on different elements of the Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act (P.A. 4 of 2011). To what extent do you support or oppose: The Emergency Manager law (P.A. 4 of 2011) overall. Survey Spring 2012 Categories State government, State oversight, State policies, Emergency Manager Law Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 38 The state has recently enacted a new program called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP). EVIP replaces the former statutory revenue sharing program. How familiar are you with the Economic Vitality Incentive Program? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 39 Certain local jurisdictions were eligible to receive statutory revenue sharing in Fiscal Year 2010. According to the new EVIP legislation, only some of those jurisdictions which were eligible in FY2010 are now eligible to receive revenue sharing through EVIP. Do you know if your jurisdiction is eligible to receive Economic Vitality Incentive Program revenue sharing funds? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 40 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to accountability and transparency, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have produced a performance dashboard and a citizen's guide to local government finances by October 1, 2011. Did your jurisdiction certify that it had produced a performance dashboard and citizen's guide as of October 1, 2011? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP, Dashboards Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 41 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds related to collaboration/consolidation/service sharing, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place with one or more proposals to either launch new efforts or to increase existing levels of cooperation, collaboration, and consolidation, either within the jurisdiction or with other jurisdictions by January 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by January 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 42 In order to receive the EVIP revenue sharing funds regarding best practices in employee compensation, eligible jurisdictions must certify they have a plan in place to meet certain state-specified requirements in employee health care premiums and post-employment benefits by May 1, 2012. Do you expect your jurisdiction will certify in this category by May 1, 2012? (Among jurisdictions that report being eligible for EVIP revenue sharing) Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 45 Beyond revenue sharing, the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) also has additional funds for assistance grants available to all Michigan city, village, township, and county governments to offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts to combine government operations that occur on or after October 1, 2011. How familiar are you with this section of the EVIP? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last
Question 46 How likely is it that your jurisdiction will apply for an Economic Vitality Incentive Program grant to help offset costs associated with mergers, interlocal agreements, and cooperative efforts? Survey Fall 2011 Categories Finance Budget and Operations, State government, Performance management, State oversight, System of Funding Local Government, EVIP Pagination First page first Previous page previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Current page 4 Page 5 Next page next Last page last