Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Spring 2010 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q5m: Thinking about next fiscal year, which actions will your jurisdiction likely take regarding the number of interlocal agreements or cost sharing plans?

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Thinking about next fiscal year, which actions will your jurisdiction likely take regarding the number of interlocal agreements or cost sharing plans? Greatly Decreased 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Somewhat Decreased 0% 1% 0% 0% 1%
No Change 36% 63% 38% 63% 57%
Somewhat Increased 62% 28% 56% 32% 36%
Greatly Increased 0% 1% 3% 2% 2%
Don't Know% 2% 6% 3% 3% 5%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
  Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Thinking about next fiscal year, which actions will your jurisdiction likely take regarding the number of interlocal agreements or cost sharing plans? Greatly Decreased 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0%
Somewhat Decreased 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1%
No Change 70% 58% 53% 39% 21% 57%
Somewhat Increased 24% 33% 41% 50% 78% 36%
Greatly Increased 1% 2% 1% 5% 1% 2%
Don't Know 5% 6% 3% 5% 1% 5%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
  Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Thinking about next fiscal year, which actions will your jurisdiction likely take regarding the number of interlocal agreements or cost sharing plans? Greatly Decreased 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Somewhat Decreased 0% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1%
No Change 67% 62% 53% 64% 60% 43% 57%
Somewhat Increased 28% 33% 39% 27% 33% 49% 36%
Greatly Increased 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2%
Don't Know 4% 3% 6% 8% 4% 3% 5%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

« Back to the table of contents