The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS) is a program of state-wide surveys of local government leaders in Michigan. The MPPS is designed to fill an important information gap in the policymaking process. While there are ongoing surveys of the business community and of the citizens of Michigan, before the MPPS there were no ongoing surveys of local government officials that were representative of all general purpose local governments in the state. Therefore, while we knew the policy priorities and views of the state's businesses and citizens, we knew very little about the views of the local officials who are so important to the economies and community life throughout Michigan.
The MPPS was launched in 2009 by the Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy (CLOSUP) at the University of Michigan and is conducted in partnership with the Michigan Association of Counties, Michigan Municipal League, and Michigan Townships Association. The associations provide CLOSUP with contact information for the survey's respondents, and consult on survey topics. CLOSUP makes all decisions on survey design, data analysis, and reporting, and receives no funding support from the associations.
The surveys investigate local officials' opinions and perspectives on a variety of important public policy issues and solicit factual information about their localities relevant to policymaking. Over time, the program has covered issues such as fiscal, budgetary and operational policy, fiscal health, public sector compensation, workforce development, local-state governmental relations, intergovernmental collaboration, economic development strategies and initiatives such as placemaking and economic gardening, the role of local government in environmental sustainability, energy topics such as hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") and wind power, trust in government, views on state policymaker performance, opinions on the impacts of the Federal Stimulus Program (ARRA), and more. The program will investigate many other issues relevant to local and state policy in the future.
Few Michigan jurisdictions have adopted Complete Streets policies, though many see potential benefits
Michigan local government leaders say transit services are important, but lack of funding discourages their development
Michigan local governments finally pass fiscal health tipping point overall, but one in four still report decline
Fracking as a community issue in Michigan
The impact of tax-exempt properties on Michigan local governments
Michigan's local leaders generally support Detroit bankruptcy filing despite some concerns
Michigan local governments increasingly pursue placemaking for economic development
Michigan local government fiscal health continues gradual improvement, but smallest jurisdictions lagging
Michigan’s local leaders satisfied with union negotiations
Michigan’s local leaders are divided over the state’s emergency manager law
Fiscal stress continues for hundreds of Michigan jurisdictions, but conditions trend in positive direction overall
Local government leaders say most employees are not overpaid, though some benefits may be too generous
Local government leaders say economic gardening can help grow their economies
Local governments struggle to cope with fiscal, service, and staffing pressures
Michigan local governments actively promote U.S. Census participation
Fiscal Stimulus Package Mostly Ineffective for Local Economies
Fall 2009 Key Findings Report: Educational, Economic, and Workforce Development Issues at the Local Level
October 2009: Local Government Fiscal and Economic Development Issues