Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Fall 2011 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q22c. Is your jurisdiction most likely to develop its data and performance measures by patterning after an available model?

(Among jurisdictions that report no current data use, but are considering potential new uses)

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Percentage of jurisdictions likely to pattern performance measures after an available model (Among jurisdictions that report no current data use, but are considering potential new uses):
21% 24% 40% 31% 27%
Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Percentage of jurisdictions likely to pattern performance measures after an available model (Among jurisdictions that report no current data use, but are considering potential new uses):
12% 37% 25% 63% 30% 27%
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Percentage of jurisdictions likely to pattern performance measures after an available model (Among jurisdictions that report no current data use, but are considering potential new uses):
8% 34% 27% 21% 33% 42% 27%

« Back to the table of contents