Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Fall 2009 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q25: Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not?

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? yes, positive impact 6% 1% 5% 1% 2%
yes, negative impact 62% 4% 45% 8% 14%
no impact 23% 73% 43% 79% 66%
don't know 9% 23% 7% 11% 18%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
  Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? yes, positive impact 1% 1% 3% 3% 12% 2%
yes, negative impact 3% 7% 25% 45% 63% 14%
no impact 76% 73% 58% 39% 16% 66%
don't know 20% 19% 14% 13% 10% 18%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
  Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? yes, positive impact 1% 2% 1% 2% 0% 5% 2%
yes, negative impact 8% 7% 15% 8% 15% 28% 14%
no impact 72% 68% 67% 72% 65% 56% 66%
don't know 19% 23% 18% 19% 20% 11% 18%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

« Back to the table of contents